Customer Reference Programs: Incentive Strategies That Work - A Community Discussion
In a recent discussion, community members shared their experiences with different incentive models for driving customer reference nominations. Here's what we learned about what works - and what doesn't.
The Case for Substantial Quarterly Incentives
Emily G. shared a successful approach from her previous company that used tiered incentives:
- One entry into a $3K quarterly raffle for each advocate recommendation
- Additional entries into a $5K raffle when nominated advocates participated in advocacy activities
- In contrast, her current company's smaller incentives ($50 gift cards per nomination) have seen less traction, highlighting the potential importance of incentive size.
Integration with CSM Goals: A Strategic Win
Christine Newman found that moving away from spiffs entirely and incorporating advocacy into CSM goals proved highly successful. Her approach included:
- Direct collaboration with the VP of Customer Success
- Setting specific, achievable targets (approximately one nomination per CSM per month)
- Public recognition of CS team contributions
- Breaking down large goals into manageable metrics per CSM
Challenges with Spiff Programs
Nicole Saunders highlighted several challenges with spiff-based programs:
- Generated low-value activity without producing quality advocates
- Tracking difficulties across extended timeframes
- Budget strain from delayed payouts
- Administrative burden in program management
A Targeted Approach to Spiffs
Jeanne Nitschke shared a highly successful targeted spiff campaign:
- Focused specifically on enterprise CSMs
- Rewarded only accepted/approved nominations, not just submissions
- Secured executive alignment from Chief Customer Officer
- Included comprehensive enablement and communication
- Resulted in 430 new reference contacts in just 30 days
- Used as a launch strategy rather than an ongoing program
Key Takeaways
- One size doesn't fit all - program success depends heavily on company culture and team structure
- Integration with formal goals can be more effective than monetary incentives alone
- Clear metrics, executive buy-in, and proper enablement are crucial
- Consider targeted, time-limited campaigns rather than ongoing spiff programs
- Celebrate successes and recognize contributors publicly
Whether you're launching a new reference program or revamping an existing one, these insights provide valuable perspectives on structuring incentives effectively.